What Is A Brute Fact?| Van Tilian Philosophy Series #1


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Brute Facts Are Mute Facts: A Van Tilian Transcendental Argument

Recent discussions on the Internet have led me to believe that there is a need to write this post. Here I will be clarifying, formalizing, and defending an argument which I believe is central to Van Til’s thought. To my knowledge, there is no such clarification and formalization of the argument available and so in writing this article, I hope to bring something fresh to the Van Tilian’s arsenal of arguments. Van Til’s Doctrine of Analogy Central to Van Til’s thought is the doctrine of analogy. Van Til made a distinction between reasoning that is univocal and reasoning which is analogical . Greg Bahnsen describes univocal reasoning in this way: “ Univocal” reasoning does not honor the Creator-creature distinction, but assumes that God and man approach knowing in the same way and under essentially the same conditions. It refuses to “think God’s thoughts after Him” (cf. chap. 4.5 above) and asserts its intellectual autonomy. 1 However, for Van Til, human knowledge must be analogical. Tha...
Read more

Why Atheists Can’t Know That 2 Apples + 2 Apples = 4 Apples...

The title of this article may be a bit misleading. There are obviously very capable and very knowledgeable mathematicians who are atheists. Such people do not only know that two apples plus two apples equals four apples, they can also provide elaborate proofs of the various mathematical theorems that undergird such a truth. This post is not meant as an attack on the intellect of atheists but rather as an attack on atheism as a philosophical system . A more accurate title would be “ Why Atheists Can’t Know that 2 Apples + 2 Apples = 4 Apples If They Were Being Consistent With Their Philosophical System ”. I know, not very catchy! But what is it about atheism as a philosophical system that precludes knowledge of a truth so basic and fundamental that even children know it? The short answer is that atheism commits one to an autonomous epistemology—an epistemology that rejects the necessity of divine revelation. Believing that two apples plus two apples equals four apples is easy enough. Th...
Read more

Stroud’s Got Nothing on Van Til: A Response to Dr. Alex Malpass

I was bored this morning and so I decided to get on YouTube. I clicked on the Search bar and typed in “Presuppositionalism”. My aim was to get a feel of the YouTube discourse surrounding Presuppositionalism because from what I remembered, it wasn’t very good. So I scrolled along, saw some videos I’ve watched before, and also some I haven’t watched. But I came across a particular video that caught my attention. It was titled “Alex Malpass on presuppositionalism” and you can find it here ( https://youtu.be/-4PipfxAVAQ ) It caught my attention because (1) it was relatively short at just 7 minutes long, (2) because I actually rate Dr. Alex Malpass highly when it comes to critiquing Presuppositionalism. I believe that, unlike most other critics, he’s a bit more conversant with the relevant literature and his objections are a bit more interesting and philosophically nuanced due to the fact that he has a PhD in philosophy, and (3) because it was a relatively recent video being just 4 months o...
Read more